|  | 
 
        
          | Towards a global 
            cyber institute – Part 2. By Allan J. Sayle, President Allan Sayle 
            Associates
 |  |  Local national interests
 There seems no reason why the new Institute cannot set up sub-sites or 
        threads dealing exclusively with local, national matters. A page for the 
        Brits, one for the Norwegians, one for India, one for China, or Singapore, 
        or Brazil, or Egypt, or Australia etc. Each could have its own moderator 
        working in accordance with the Institute protocols and rules.
 
 What is important is that regardless of where the main host site is situated, 
        say, in America or India the new Institute is not regarded as a primarily 
        single nation endeavor. One of the Cove’s and Saferpak’s strengths 
        is the participation of so many non-Americans and non-Brits: all are welcome 
        and all given equal respect. Such values must continue and prevail. Jingoism 
        and petty nationalism can have no place in a global Institute.
 
 And, simply because the Institute works primarily through cyberspace, 
        there is no reason why local people cannot run face-to-face meetings which 
        could be promoted on the Institute’s site by means of newsletter 
        or equivalent and reported on in the same way. Setting up such an institute 
        does not mean face-to-face events need be a thing of the past: far from 
        it.
 
 Many ASQ sections have web sites. Problem with most section 
        meetings is they tend not to be well attended: 10% of local membership 
        is often regarded as a good turnout. The topics might appeal to a few 
        and are insufficiently wide ranging. The new Institute can also have local 
        sections and host their own chat rooms. The Elsmar Cove, for example, 
        is an incessant section meeting.
 
 Naturally, if locals wish to foregather in a pub, hotel, café or 
        whatever at regular intervals or whenever, there is nothing to stop them. 
        And is it not a saving that instead of one’s institute HQ demanding 
        money for a list of one’s section members, that would be for free 
        as all would be on the database? The members could opt out of notification, 
        adverts, flyers and so forth, thereby knowing their names and details 
        are not being distributed or sold and their privacy will not be intruded 
        upon if they so wish. Privacy already exists at the Cove and Saferpak 
        if you choose. From my experience BAMs take scant notice of my preferences 
        not to receive solicitations and junk mail at my home or office.
 
 The possibility of ad-hoc face-to-face meetings is also greater. 
        Place a post, state the time, place and topic. Visiting from out of town 
        on business, doing an audit, assessing a supplier, don’t want to 
        be hotel-bound? No problem. Post where you will be, meet up, enjoy a drink 
        and chat together. That is real networking and it is already happening.
 
 Language
 
 The Cove and Saferpak both use English as the prime language 
        for communications. But, there really is no reason why national moderators 
        should not also encourage threads in local languages. However, the moderator 
        would need to be fluent in English as well and ensure the Institute’s 
        rules for conduct, courtesy, libel and so forth are adhered to.
 
 Moreover, in posting an article in the Institute’s Reading Room 
        or Library, the author might be required to give permission for it to 
        be translated into other languages solely for posting on the Institute’s 
        site while retaining copyright.
 
      Articles 
        for the site or for the Library or Reading Room       
                                       top of page |  |