  | 
     
         
            | 
           | 
         
         
            | 
         
       
      Corporate Communications in Crisis 
        By Professor Colin Coulson-Thomas 
         
        Modern corporations are essentially networks of relationships based 
        upon trust. When a reputation for fair dealing and accurate reporting 
        is compromised the consequences can be dramatic. Worldcom imploded. 
         
        Executives at Enron went to great lengths to conceal the true state of 
        their companies’ affairs. As a consequence, customers have lost 
        a supplier and suppliers a customer. Employees have forfeited their jobs 
        and investors their savings. Association with misrepresentation sealed 
        the fate of Arthur Andersen. 
         
        Are recent high profile scandals isolated instances of deception? Or is 
        there a wider crisis in corporate communications? Looking ahead what should 
        we look out for to predict or prevent future meltdowns? 
         
        Corporate value statements advocate openness. Professional codes of practice 
        champion integrity. Managers are expected to have ‘communication 
        skills’. Substantial investments have been made in communications 
        technologies. A distinctive vision, stretching goals and clear objectives 
        can inspire, excite and energise people. However, many companies fall 
        short of these ideals. 
         
        Looking at what communicators actually do rather than what they say reveals 
        a wide gulf between corporate rhetoric and commercial reality. People 
        are drowning in irrelevant information. They are overloaded, overworked 
        and insecure. With little time to think many do not see the wood for the 
        trees. Some suspect that corporate communications are all smoke and mirrors. 
         
        The Centre for Competitiveness has examined the communications practices 
        of a wide range of companies in key areas such as winning business, building 
        relationships and managing change. Research teams compare the approaches 
        of ‘winners’, companies that cope with changing circumstances, 
        with ‘losers’, businesses that struggle or fail. Fundamental 
        differences of attitudes and behaviour emerge. 
         
        Lets start with vulnerable companies and practices that should trigger 
        alarm bells. Communications are largely top down and one-way. Communicators 
        simply pass on whatever messages their bosses wish to communicate. They 
        don’t question a brief or ask whether information they are handed 
        is accurate or fair. 
         
        Losers only communicate when they feel they need to. They become preoccupied 
        with messages they would like to put across. Recipients are just targets. 
        Smart communicators in floundering companies pride themselves on their 
        ability to distract, exaggerate or keep a situation under wraps. They 
        avoid speaking to people directly and hide behind technology. Sanitised 
        summaries are posted on corporate Intranets. 
         
        The communications of struggling companies are often bland and non-committal. 
        They give little away. Bad news is hidden under the carpet. Slick packaging 
        encourages passive acceptance. Communicators mouth generalisations and 
        repeat slogans. Their work is often of a high technical standard. But 
        the focus is upon form and style rather than relevance and impact. 
         
        Communicators in stagnant and dying companies are emotionally detached. 
        They display little personal commitment to corporate messages. Their communications 
        are cold, clinical and bland. Many are sophists and cynics. Communications 
        is a game to be played. Scoring points is more important than helping 
        others to understand. 
         
        In ailing companies corporate communications is a distinct activity undertaken 
        by dedicated specialists. They do the CEO’s bidding, work mechanically 
        and struggle to highlight what is different, special or unique about their 
        employer. Not surprisingly they fail to connect with key stakeholder groups 
        and spend much of their time rationalising failure. When they stumble 
        few help. People who have been tricked or feel duped look the other way. 
         
        Communicators in successful businesses are more confident and have less 
        to hide. They behave very differently. They share information, knowledge 
        and understanding with people whose cooperation is needed to achieve corporate 
        aspirations. They engage in two-way communication. They encourage, welcome 
        and react to feedback. 
      Good communicators are not pre-occupied with themselves. They focus on 
        the people they would like to establish, build and sustain relationships 
        with. They try to understand, empathise with and reflect their aspirations, 
        hopes and fears. They make direct and personal contact. They feel. They 
        may stumble over the words, but they demonstrate they care. 
         
        Communicators in winning companies consciously build mutually beneficial 
        relationships. They forge longer-term partnerships. They are both sensitive 
        and flexible. They listen. They monitor reactions and are alert to changing 
        requirements. Communications activities evolve, as changes are made to 
        ensure greater relevance. 
         
        Effective communicators identify unmet needs, analyse communications barriers 
        and address problems. They recognise the importance of symbols and are 
        visibly committed. They understand they and their colleagues will be judged 
        by what their actions and conduct. They endeavour to match words with 
        deeds. 
         
        In companies with prospects communication is an integral element of management. 
        It is built into work processes and the roles of managers. Communicators 
        think for themselves. They question motivations, probe sources and assess 
        likely implications. They take steps to ensure the veracity of corporate 
        messages. They assume responsibility for what they communicate. 
         
        Winners explain with conviction the essence of what they are about. Their 
        communications celebrate and sustain success. They engender allegiance 
        and foster relationships that withstand market shocks and survive the 
        traumas of economic downturn. People trust them and will put themselves 
        out for them. 
         
        Investors, employees, customers, suppliers and independent directors should 
        never take corporate communications for granted. The intelligence, standing 
        and bravado of corporate leaders and their professional advisers are no 
        guarantee the full story is being told. Be alert to tell tale signs of 
        whether communication approaches and practices indicate likely failure 
        or herald future success.  
      Prof. 
        Colin Coulson-Thomas, Author of 'Transforming the Company: manage 
        change, compete and win' (Kogan Page, 2002). 
         
         
       
      
        
      
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
        
      top of page  | 
      |